Metal Detecting Laws in Papua New Guinea

Evidence-gap guide: Papua New Guinea’s current rules for hobby detecting, digging, keeping finds and reporting discoveries could not be confirmed. All fourteen questions covered here remain unresolved, including the eight main land and finds topics below. Older legal texts and visitor guidance help explain the gaps, but do not establish current permission, prohibition or ownership. Provincial, local, customary-land, forest-unit, protected-area and parcel-specific coverage is incomplete.

The rules, land by land

Even where detecting is allowed, archaeological and historic sites are protected, and you must fill every hole and follow posted rules. Always confirm the current rule with the land manager.

Detecting beyond Papua New Guinea? We cover 207 more countries rule by rule too. See the world map →

Open data: unresolved questions in our Papua New Guinea guide, with recorded references or unverified research targets where available, free to reuse (CC BY-SA 4.0). Download the data →

National detecting and digging

The current national rule for recreational detector use is unknown. Detector sweeping, searching for cultural objects and disturbing the ground need separate answers; an older excavation provision does not establish a general detector rule or a hobby permit.

The retained [National Cultural Property (Preservation) Act 1965, Chapter 156](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png65547.pdf) and [National Cultural Property (Preservation) Regulation 1965](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png65548.pdf) do not establish the complete current framework. The retained research has an unverified source lead labeled as a 2015 amendment, but no full amendment text, application or commencement evidence, or reconciled current consolidation. Whether the retained Act edition incorporates any changes from the referenced amendment is unconfirmed. The regulation reprint is dated November 25, 2006 and states that it was in force on July 1, 2001; that is not a current-law date.

Questions to resolve locally: which current provisions govern using a detector, searching and digging, and does archaeological or modern lost-item purpose change the answer? Who can qualify for any authorization, and what exceptions apply? Updating this answer requires the complete current heritage and search framework, its implementation, verification of the 2015 amendment lead, and reconciliation of any applicable amendments with the retained provisions.

Protected historical places

Current detecting and recovery rules at protected historical places are unknown. The older heritage Act’s section 20 concerns specified places and objects: ancient remains, rock or cave representations, deposits of ancient pottery or historical remains, and former ceremonial or burying grounds. It does not establish that every detector sweep or every excavation anywhere requires the same consent.

As historical context only, section 20(3) in that edition addresses wilfully or negligently defacing, damaging, uncovering, exposing, excavating or otherwise interfering with those places or objects, without the National Cultural Commission’s written consent and without lawful and reasonable excuse. Proof of that excuse is placed on the person concerned. Section 3 also provides for conditional Gazette exemptions for specified things or classes, or persons, bodies or authorities; no particular exemption notice is available here. These older terms do not establish a current permit procedure.

Questions to resolve locally: is the place or object currently protected, what boundaries or designation apply, and how do the operative rules distinguish sweeping from excavation or interference? Current protection instruments, consent powers, fault elements, exceptions and implementation are needed alongside the complete amended heritage framework.

Private and customary land

Current detecting and recovery rights on private or customary land are unknown. The Papua New Guinea Tourism Promotion Authority’s [Safety & Health guidance](https://papuanewguinea.travel/safety-and-health/) advises asking permission for access to land and beaches owned by a village, family or individual. That visitor guidance does not authorize detecting or digging. The retained [Land Act 1996](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png20843.pdf) also does not establish the actual rights over a particular parcel here.

Questions to resolve locally: who holds the relevant land interest and can consent to entry or disturbance, and what separate current rule governs searching or recovery? Does an agreement address ownership of a find at all? A reliable answer needs the parcel’s current land or customary interests, any relevant consent, and the applicable heritage and activity-specific law. Access consent is not established here as legal clearance for all those questions.

Beaches, foreshores and wreck

Current recreational detecting and recovery rules on beaches are unknown. The shore’s classification, access rights, customary or other land interests, and local or protected-area controls need confirmation. Tourism access guidance cannot settle detector use or digging, and a wreck provision is not a rule for every modern object lost on a beach.

Wreck reporting, delivery and retention are also unresolved. The retained [Merchant Shipping Act 1975, Chapter 242](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png52195.pdf) contains a wreck framework. The retained research has an unverified source lead labeled as a 2015 amendment, but no full amendment text, application or commencement evidence, or reconciled current consolidation. Whether the retained edition incorporates any changes from the referenced amendment is unconfirmed. The prescribed notification, delivery and disposal procedures are also missing. Its older wording is not a present reporting instruction or a finder’s entitlement.

Questions to resolve locally: what qualifies as wreck, which territorial or brought-in trigger applies, and who must receive notice or delivery, by what method and when? What reasonable-cause and proof qualifications apply? For keeping wreck, the current owner-claim, custody, disposal, agency and third-party title rules need to be established separately from any finder right. Current shipping provisions and the prescribed procedures are needed before these answers can be updated.

National parks and protected areas

Current detecting and recovery rules across national parks and protected areas are unknown. The retained [National Parks By-laws 1974](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png41667.pdf) contain a consent provision for digging or interfering with soil and other natural substances in reserves, but the copy’s blank instrument, date and signature fields do not establish promulgation or present validity.

The [Conservation and Environment Protection Authority Act 2014](https://lpr.adb.org/sites/default/files/resource/591/png-conservation-and-environment-protection-authority-act-2014.pdf.pdf) includes repeal and savings provisions concerning the [National Parks Act 1982](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png65761.pdf) and compatible subordinate enactments. The [Protected Areas Act 2024, No. 9 of 2024](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png233711.pdf) also contains controls on removing natural things or cultural heritage objects. The required National Gazette commencement notices for the 2014 and 2024 Acts are missing here. Their absence does not prove that either Act has failed to commence, and the older texts do not establish the current regime.

Questions to resolve locally: which regime, protected-area category, boundaries and management instruments currently apply? What do they say about entry, digging and removal, including consent powers and exceptions? Updating this answer requires the actual commencement notices, operative repeal and savings provisions, valid subordinate instruments and the place’s designation and management rules.

Public forests

Current hobby-detecting and recovery rules in public forests are unknown. The retained [Forestry Act 1991](https://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/png22285.pdf) does not establish a current rule for the entire land category. A complete current consolidation and the actual forest’s tenure, classification and management rules are missing.

Questions to resolve locally: what land interests and management instruments apply, and do they address entry, detector use or recovery? How does the current heritage framework apply at that place? Operative forest provisions and the relevant unit-level instruments are needed; a general reference to forestry law cannot establish permission or prohibition for a particular search.

Keeping and exporting a find

A finder’s current title to cultural objects, ordinary lost property and relevant war-surplus objects is unknown. Ownership, possession, reporting and export are separate questions. This guide cannot establish an entitlement merely because an object was discovered or because an older text discusses its treatment.

The retained [Criminal Code Act 1974](https://sherloc.unodc.org/cld/uploads/res/legislation/png/criminal-code_html/Papua_New_Guinea_Criminal_Code_Act_1974.pdf) provides limited historical context for ordinary finds. For a thing lost by its owner and found by the person converting it, section 365(7) says the conversion is not fraudulent if, at the time of conversion, that person does not know the owner and believes on reasonable grounds that the owner cannot be discovered. Both conditions matter. That provision alone does not grant title or displace cultural-property or wreck rules, and the complete current position remains unconfirmed.

Current cultural-property export consent is also unresolved. The older heritage text’s export provision does not establish initial ownership or a present right to retain an object domestically. Questions to resolve locally include the object’s current legal category, original-owner, State, customary or other claims, and any separate export consent, conditions or exemptions. Updating these answers requires operative title and relevant war-surplus provisions, the current heritage and wreck frameworks, and current export and implementing rules.

Reporting discoveries and proclaimed property

Current reporting, preservation and handover requirements are unknown. The older heritage Act distinguishes discoveries of specified historical places or objects from notice concerning proclaimed cultural property. Its section 20 does not establish a reporting rule for every modern lost item, and its older recipients and timing cannot be treated here as the current procedure.

Questions to resolve locally: which discoveries require a report, who must make it, to whom, by what method and when? What preservation or delivery requirements, defenses and exceptions apply? For proclaimed property, establish whether a current proclamation covers it, who has possession or control, and which notice duties concern its nature, situation or condition, later changes, or breaking up or disposing of a collection.

Updating these answers requires the complete operative discovery and proclaimed-property provisions, actual proclamations, prescribed forms, exemptions and evidence identifying the current recipient. Wreck notification needs its own shipping-law confirmation. References to an amendment or an older deadline cannot substitute for those documents.

Sources and research leads

This evidence-gap guide records unresolved questions. The references below do not establish current detecting rules.

Recorded references

• National Cultural Property (Preservation) Act 1965, Chapter 156
• National Cultural Property (Preservation) Regulation 1965
• Merchant Shipping Act 1975, Chapter 242
• Criminal Code Act 1974
• Forestry Act 1991
• Land Act 1996
• National Parks By-laws 1974
• Conservation and Environment Protection Authority Act 2014
• Protected Areas Act 2024, No. 9 of 2024
• Safety & Health
• National Parks Act 1982
• National Cultural Property (Preservation) (Amendment) Act 2015
• Protected Areas Act 2024 — Parliament URL
• Merchant Shipping Act — NMSA URL
• National Museum and Art Gallery
• Merchant Shipping (Amendment) Act 2015
• FAOLEX country-profile index
• National Parks Act — SPREP URL
• Papua New Guinea legislation index, April 2022

Find more, remember where

Download LuckyFind — free for iPhone and Android — to track your routes, log your finds, and keep your permitted spots organized.