A complete rule for ordinary metal detecting in the French Southern Territories has not been established. All eight core questions remain unknown as territory-wide answers. The available laws and official guidance distinguish access to land, archaeological work, protected areas and rights over finds. Permission for one of those activities does not settle the others.
Can I detect in French Southern Territories?
The short answer for each kind of land. Tap a card for the detail and the rule’s own words.
- Anywhere: national heritage lawNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
- Beaches & foreshoreNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
- Protected monumentsNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
- National parks & nature reservesNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
- State forestsNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
- Private landNo verdict yetChecked against the source Oct 13, 2026
Open in many areas without a permitPermit, registration, or designated beaches onlyProhibited or effectively closed
The rules, land by land
Anywhere: national heritage law
No verdict yetA complete rule for ordinary lost-item detecting across the territory could not be confirmed.
- This record covers the five districts administered as Terres australes et antarctiques françaises (French Southern and Antarctic Lands, TAAF). The administration describes legislative specialty with specified automatic categories. A metropolitan detector rule is not assumed to apply unchanged. The Ministry index identifies Code du patrimoine (Heritage Code) articles L.770-1 and R.770-5 to R.770-9, but their current complete territorial extension and adaptation text was not obtained.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Environmental Code Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. The captured agency guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact; it does not approve every activity.
- The captured January 2022 Code minier (Mining Code), articles L661-1 to L661-3, extends mining law subject to Antarctic measures, territorial adaptations and stricter environmental rules. Later amendments remain unresolved. Mineral-resource activity, archaeological searching, excavation and searching for modern manufactured losses are distinct questions; no general detector permission is inferred from an access order or an older mining version.
What the rule says
“Les chapitres II à VI du présent arrêté sont applicables dans les districts des Terres australes françaises (Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul et Amsterdam) et dans le district des îles Éparses.”
Keeping finds
No verdict yetFinder ownership and the right to remove finds could not be fully confirmed.
- The administration identifies civil law among the automatically applicable categories, but the complete current special-property chain is unresolved. The reused Code civil (Civil Code) article 716 text defines treasure as hidden or buried property for which no one can establish ownership, discovered purely by chance. It assigns it to the finder on the finder’s own land, or half to the finder and half to the landowner on another’s land. This definition is not a promise of ownership after a planned detector search, and it does not govern every ordinary loss.
- Archaeological and maritime property rules may displace ordinary treasure rules. The historical Heritage Code captures and the current territorial index do not establish a complete current TAAF extension or its exceptions. No blanket State ownership, finder reward or right to retain an ordinary lost object is asserted.
- Order 2016-108 concerns specifically listed TAAF-owned objects from the 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2013 Tromelin excavation campaigns. Its movement and alteration controls do not assign all future finds to TAAF. The referenced annex was not captured. Permission to enter land, conduct research or report an object does not establish ownership or removal authority.
What the rule says
“Le trésor est toute chose cachée ou enfouie sur laquelle personne ne peut justifier sa propriété, et qui est découverte par le pur effet du hasard.”
Reporting finds
No verdict yetA complete territorial reporting route for ordinary and heritage finds could not be confirmed.
- The Ministry’s general maritime cultural-property procedure states that a person who discovers qualifying property must leave it in place without damage and declare it within 48 hours of discovery or arrival at the first port. It identifies the Département des Recherches Archéologiques Subaquatiques et Sous-Marines (Department of Underwater and Submarine Archaeological Research, DRASSM). The exact TAAF extension and administrative adaptations remain uncaptured, so this row does not assign that deadline to every territorial find.
- The reused historical chance-find provision names a mayor; the current Heritage Code territorial index shows that TAAF adaptations must be checked. No mayor, prefect or district reporting route is invented from another jurisdiction’s procedure. The heritage commission’s consultation before excavation authorization is an administrative step, not an ordinary finder-reporting deadline.
- An ordinary modern lost object, archaeological chance discovery and maritime cultural property require separate classification. Reporting, leaving an object in place, surrender and ownership are separate questions; none supplies an automatic right to keep it.
What the rule says
“Toute personne qui découvre un bien culturel maritime est tenue de le laisser en place et ne pas y porter atteinte.”
Beaches & foreshore
No verdict yetBeach access does not establish permission to detect or recover objects.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Environmental Code Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. The captured agency guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact; it does not approve every activity.
- Southern-district shores lie within the reserve coverage described by its administering agency; Glorieuses has a separately identified 2021 reserve, and other Scattered Islands require their own current instrument checks. The 2016 Southern-reserve amendment adds marine provisions, while the complete 2022 amended regime is missing. Land access, anchoring, marine prospecting and taking material are distinct activities.
- The general maritime cultural-property procedure and historical maritime Heritage Code capture do not settle the complete current TAAF extension or ordinary beach-loss recovery. No right to beach access, digging, salvage, title or removal is inferred.
What the rule says
“Sans préjudice des interdictions ou modalités d’accès spécifiques à certains sites et secteurs spécialement protégés, l’accès à terre est soumis à l’autorisation préalable du préfet, administrateur supérieur des TAAF,”
Protected monuments
No verdict yetOrdinary detector use at protected heritage places remains unconfirmed.
- The captured Arrêté n° 2020-17 (heritage and toponymy commission order), article 3, requires consultation of the commission before the administrator issues excavation or test-pit authorizations under Title II of loi n° 56-1106 (law protecting monuments, sites and historical objects and regulating excavations). Article 15 expressly repeals arrêté n° 2020-04. Later amendments, the full current 1956-law chain and the Heritage Code extension remain unverified. Archaeological excavation authorization is not a demonstrated permit requirement for every modern-loss detector sweep.
- The captured agency descriptions identify protected heritage management in the Southern districts and Scattered Islands, and historic sites and monuments in Terre Adélie under Antarctic arrangements. Current designation, boundary, management-plan and access conditions remain unit-specific dependencies; no site coordinates are supplied.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Environmental Code Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. The captured agency guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact; it does not approve every activity.
What the rule says
“Elle est notamment consultée par l'administrateur supérieur préalablement à la délivrance par celui-ci de toute autorisation pour l'exercice de fouilles ou de sondages, conformément aux dispositions du titre II de la loi du 3 novembre 1956 susvisée.”
National parks & nature reserves
No verdict yetA complete ordinary-detecting rule for the territory’s different protected areas remains unconfirmed.
- The reserve manager identifies the Réserve naturelle nationale des Terres australes françaises (French Southern Lands National Nature Reserve) across Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, with general, integral-protection and enhanced-marine regimes. Its guidance describes integral-zone access and human-activity restrictions with force-majeure, sovereignty and prefectural derogation provisions. The full current 2006 decree as amended in 2016 and 2022 was not captured; an abbreviated plan is not used to erase exceptions or impose one rule everywhere.
- Glorieuses has a separate 2021 reserve. Europa, Bassas da India, Juan de Nova and Tromelin have unresolved material island-protection instruments; they are not silently covered by the Southern reserve. Scientific-site decisions and current renewal or expiry also remain unresolved.
- For Terre Adélie, the administration identifies Antarctic Specially Protected Areas 120 and 166 and historic sites and monuments 46, 47, 48 and 81. Complete current plans, French implementing measures and exact detector or recovery conditions remain missing. The international Protocol’s mineral-resource prohibition has a scientific-research exception; it does not itself classify every manufactured lost object as a mineral resource. No Australian domestic rules are imported from its agency’s explanation.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Environmental Code Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. The captured agency guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact; it does not approve every activity.
What the rule says
“Les chapitres II à VI du présent arrêté sont applicables dans les districts des Terres australes françaises (Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul et Amsterdam) et dans le district des îles Éparses.”
State forests
No verdict yetA general rule for detecting in territorial woodland could not be confirmed.
- The reserve manager describes native Phylica arborea woodland and restoration on Amsterdam; the Scattered Islands descriptions also include wooded vegetation. The territory is not treated as having no forests. These ecological descriptions do not establish a separate public-forest detector regime or ownership of every wooded parcel.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- The current reserve or island protection rules, vegetation disturbance, access conditions and any applicable land-property instrument must be resolved for the actual woodland. No all-dig ban, ordinary detector permission or ownership right is inferred from a restoration plan or mineral-collection summary.
What the rule says
“Sans préjudice des interdictions ou modalités d’accès spécifiques à certains sites et secteurs spécialement protégés, l’accès à terre est soumis à l’autorisation préalable du préfet, administrateur supérieur des TAAF,”
Private land
No verdict yetPrivate-land consent alone does not establish a complete detector or recovery right.
- The territory’s lack of permanent residents and its central administration do not prove every parcel or object is unowned or freely accessible. The captured 2016 order cites arrêté n° 2000-35 (order on land-property and buildings), but its full current text and any applicable grants, leases or private rights were not obtained.
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 (access, anchoring and stationing order) article 3 requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without prejudice to special protected-site access rules. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Access authorization is not detector, excavation or removal authorization.
- For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Environmental Code Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. The captured agency guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact; it does not approve every activity.
- Landholder consent, prefectural access approval, archaeological authorization, physical recovery and ownership of a find are distinct. The historical metropolitan detector procedure’s written-owner-consent language is not transplanted to TAAF without its current extension and adaptations. No private-land exemption from heritage, reserve or Antarctic rules was established.
What the rule says
“Sans préjudice des interdictions ou modalités d’accès spécifiques à certains sites et secteurs spécialement protégés, l’accès à terre est soumis à l’autorisation préalable du préfet, administrateur supérieur des TAAF,”
Even where detecting is allowed, archaeological and historic sites are protected, and you must fill every hole and follow posted rules. Always confirm the current rule with the land manager.
Detecting beyond French Southern Territories? We cover 207 more countries rule by rule too. See the world map →
Open data: every rule in our French Southern Territories guide, with its quote, source and check date, free to reuse (CC BY-SA 4.0). Download the data →
Five districts, different legal questions
This guide covers the five districts administered as Terres australes et antarctiques françaises (French Southern and Antarctic Lands, TAAF): Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, the Îles Éparses (Scattered Islands), and Terre Adélie (Adélie Land). Saint-Paul and Amsterdam form one district. French administration does not resolve disputed island claims or the Antarctic Treaty context. The material overlapping rules remain incompletely established; administrative links do not extend this guide to Réunion or Clipperton.
TAAF’s official presentation describes a system in which some categories of French law apply automatically and others need specific extension. The Ministry of Culture identifies Code du patrimoine (Heritage Code) articles L.770-1 and R.770-5 to R.770-9, but the complete current territorial adaptations were not available. A detector rule for metropolitan France cannot simply be carried over unchanged.
Heritage searches and protected historic places
The available Arrêté n° 2020-17 du 11 février 2020 relatif à la Commission du Patrimoine historique et de la Toponymie des TAAF (Order 2020-17 of February 11, 2020, on the TAAF Commission for Historical Heritage and Place Names), article 3, requires consultation of the commission before the administrator issues excavation or test-pit authorizations under Title II of loi n° 56-1106 (Law 56-1106 on protecting monuments, sites and historical objects and regulating excavations). Article 15 expressly repeals Order 2020-04. Later amendments, the complete current underlying law and territorial adaptations remain unverified. This archaeological step does not demonstrate that every modern-loss detector sweep needs the same authorization.
Official descriptions distinguish heritage management in the Southern districts and Scattered Islands from historic sites and monuments in Terre Adélie under Antarctic arrangements. The current designation, boundary, management plan and access conditions of the particular place still matter. No complete ordinary-detecting rule for protected historic places has been confirmed.
The available January 2022 version of Code minier (Mining Code), articles L661-1 to L661-3, extends mining law subject to Antarctic measures, territorial adaptations and stricter environmental rules. Later amendments remain unresolved. Mineral activity, archaeological searching and looking for a modern manufactured loss are different questions; this older text does not establish a general detector permission.
Land access and private rights
Arrêté n° 2022-102 du 22 juillet 2022 (Order 2022-102 of July 22, 2022, on access, anchoring and stationing), article 3, requires the prefect’s prior land-access authorization in Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands, without displacing special access prohibitions or conditions at protected sites. Exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized scientific research and logistical support; sovereignty missions; and force majeure, breakdown or medical emergency. Permission to enter is separate from authority to detect, excavate or remove objects.
For Terre Adélie, article 29 separately requires prior land-access authorization, without prejudice to Code de l’environnement (Environmental Code) Book VII, particularly L712-1 and R712-9. Its exceptions cover public-service missions, including authorized or declared scientific activities, logistical support, sovereignty missions, force majeure, breakdown and medical emergency. Official Antarctic guidance distinguishes environmental declaration from authorization according to impact. Neither process approves every proposed activity.
The access order was signed and displayed on July 22, 2022, but its actual gazette publication date and complete later amendment history remain unconfirmed. Private rights are another unresolved layer: the available material cites arrêté n° 2000-35 (Order 2000-35 on land property and buildings), whose full current text, grants and leases were not obtained. A lack of permanent residents does not prove that land or objects are unowned. Landholder consent alone does not establish a detector, recovery or ownership right, and no private-land exemption from heritage, reserve or Antarctic rules has been established.
Beaches, shores and marine activity
Beach access does not establish permission to detect or recover objects. The access order treats the Southern districts and Scattered Islands separately from Terre Adélie, as described above. Land access, anchoring, marine prospecting and taking material are different activities. The general maritime cultural-property guidance does not resolve ordinary beach-loss recovery throughout TAAF.
The reserve manager describes Southern-district shores within the Southern reserve. Glorieuses has a separate 2021 reserve, while other Scattered Islands still need their own current protection instruments checked. The available 2016 Southern-reserve amendment adds marine provisions, but the complete regime as amended in 2022 was not available. These sources establish neither a general beach-digging permission nor a complete prohibition on every small recovery hole.
Nature reserves and Antarctic protected areas
The manager describes the Réserve naturelle nationale des Terres australes françaises (French Southern Lands National Nature Reserve) across Crozet, Kerguelen, Saint-Paul and Amsterdam, with general, integral-protection and enhanced-marine regimes. Its guidance describes integral-zone access and human-activity restrictions with force-majeure, sovereignty and prefectural derogation provisions. The complete 2006 decree as amended in 2016 and 2022 was not available, so the guidance does not supply one complete detecting rule for every zone.
Glorieuses is a separate reserve. The material island-protection instruments for Europa, Bassas da India, Juan de Nova and Tromelin remain unresolved; those islands cannot simply be assigned the Southern reserve’s rules. Current scientific-site designations, renewals and expiry also remain to be established.
Terre Adélie has its own Antarctic protected-area and historic-site questions. The administration identifies protected units, but their complete current plans, French implementing measures and detector or recovery conditions were not available. The Madrid Protocol’s mineral-resource prohibition has a scientific-research exception; it does not itself classify every manufactured lost object as a mineral resource. An Australian agency’s explanation of that framework does not establish Australian domestic rules for TAAF.
Woodland is a separate question
The reserve manager describes native Phylica arborea woodland and restoration on Amsterdam, and the Scattered Islands descriptions also include wooded vegetation. Those ecological descriptions do not establish a general public-forest detecting rule or ownership of every wooded parcel.
The applicable reserve or island protection rules, vegetation-disturbance limits, land rights and access conditions still need to be established for the actual woodland. The article 3 access framework and its exceptions described above remain distinct from detector or recovery permission. Neither a restoration plan nor a mineral-collection summary establishes an all-dig ban or a right to keep finds.
Who owns a find?
The available archived Code civil (Civil Code), article 716, defines treasure as hidden or buried property for which no one can establish ownership, discovered purely by chance. It assigns such treasure to the finder on the finder’s own land, or half to the finder and half to the landowner on another’s land. Those qualifications matter: a planned detector search does not come with a promise of treasure ownership, and the provision does not govern every ordinary lost object.
TAAF’s administration identifies civil law among the automatically applicable categories, but the complete current special-property rules remain unresolved. Archaeological and maritime property rules may displace ordinary treasure rules. The historical Heritage Code texts and current territorial index do not establish a complete present TAAF rule on ownership, rewards or surrender.
Arrêté n° 2016-108 (Order 2016-108) concerns specifically listed TAAF-owned objects from the 2006, 2008, 2010 and 2013 Tromelin excavation campaigns. Its movement and alteration controls do not assign all future finds to TAAF, and the referenced list of objects was not available. Permission to enter, conduct research or report an object does not establish ownership or authority to remove it.
Reporting a discovery
The Ministry of Culture’s Découverte de bien culturel maritime (Discovery of maritime cultural property) procedure states that a person discovering qualifying property must leave it in place without damage and declare it within 48 hours of discovery or arrival at the first port. It identifies the Département des Recherches Archéologiques Subaquatiques et Sous-Marines (Department of Underwater and Submarine Archaeological Research, DRASSM). The exact current TAAF extension and administrative adaptations were not available, so that general guidance is not a verified deadline or route for every territorial find.
The historical chance-find provision names a mayor, but the territorial adaptations remain unresolved. This guide therefore cannot substitute a mayor, prefect or district office as the confirmed recipient for every discovery. The heritage commission’s consultation before excavation authorization is a separate administrative step, not an ordinary finder-reporting deadline.
A modern lost object, an archaeological chance discovery and maritime cultural property need separate treatment. A complete territorial reporting route for those categories has not been confirmed. Reporting, leaving an object in place, surrendering it and owning it are separate questions; none creates an automatic right to keep a find.
Sources
Official and statutory sources this page is based on (source check: October 13, 2026):
All eight core questions remain unresolved as complete territorial answers. Current legal adaptations, later amendments, protected-unit instruments, private rights and reporting routes are incomplete. Archived legal texts and official explanations are used only within their stated limits; unavailable sources do not establish that a rule or later amendment is absent.
- Conservation des Iles Australes (conservation of the Southern Islands)
- Accès et mouillage dans les Eparses (access and anchoring in the Scattered Islands)
- Les îles Éparses (the Scattered Islands)
- Répertoire des textes juridiques de l’archéologie (directory of archaeological legal texts)
- Arrêté n° 2022-102 du 22 juillet 2022 fixant les conditions d’accès aux territoires des Terres australes et antarctiques françaises et les conditions de mouillage et de stationnement dans leurs mers territoriales et eaux intérieures et abrogeant diverses dispositions et abrogeant l’arrêté n° 2022-03 du 11 janvier 2022 (order on access, anchoring and stationing)
- Conservation des Iles Éparses (conservation of the Scattered Islands)
- Conservation en terre Adélie (conservation in Adélie Land)
- L’intelligibilité du droit dans les TAAF — Rapport, 2022 (report on the intelligibility of TAAF law)
- Accès et mouillage dans les Australes (access and anchoring in the Southern Islands)
- Autorisation d’activités touristiques en Antarctique (authorization of tourist activities in Antarctica)
- Gestion du patrimoine historique (management of historical heritage)
- Plan de gestion de la réserve naturelle nationale des Terres australes françaises 2018–2027 (management plan for the French Southern Lands National Nature Reserve)
- Publications — public gazette and orders interface
- Journal officiel des Terres australes et antarctiques françaises n° 72, 31 décembre 2016 (TAAF Official Gazette No. 72)
- Journal officiel des Terres australes et antarctiques françaises n° 85, 30 mars 2020 (TAAF Official Gazette No. 85)
- Espace de documentation (documentation space)
- Réserve naturelle des Terres australes françaises — former portal (link no longer resolves at our last check; kept for the record)
- TAAF public application JavaScript asset
- Public publications GET route — Journaux officiels category 47 (link no longer resolves at our last check; kept for the record)
- Public publications GET route — Arrêtés et décisions category 46 (link no longer resolves at our last check; kept for the record)
- UNESCO World Heritage document 199890 — discovery lead (link no longer resolves at our last check; kept for the record)
- Le Parc naturel marin des Glorieuses (Glorieuses Marine Nature Park)
- Terres Australes et Antarctiques Françaises (French Southern and Antarctic Lands)
- La terre Adélie (Adélie Land)
- Communiqué, 2 juillet 2021 — réaction au décret de réserve naturelle des Glorieuses (communiqué responding to the Glorieuses reserve decree)
- Présentation (presentation of the TAAF)
- Antarctic Treaty Secretariat public website (link no longer resolves at our last check; kept for the record)
- Découverte de bien culturel maritime (discovery of maritime cultural property)
- Code minier (nouveau), état au 1er janvier 2022 (new Mining Code, version January 1, 2022)
- The Madrid Protocol
- Code du patrimoine, art. L542-1 (utilisation de détecteurs de métaux) (Heritage Code, metal detectors)
- Code du patrimoine, art. R542-1 et R542-2 (autorisation préfectorale) (Heritage Code, detector authorization)
- Code du patrimoine, art. L531-14 (découvertes fortuites) (Heritage Code, chance discoveries)
- Code du patrimoine, art. L541-4 (propriété des biens archéologiques mobiliers) (Heritage Code, movable archaeological-property title)
- Code civil, art. 716 (trésor) (Civil Code, treasure)
- Code du patrimoine, Livre V, Titre III, Chapitre 2: Biens culturels maritimes (art. L532-1 à L532-14) (Heritage Code, maritime cultural property)
- Utilisation de matériel permettant la détection d'objets métalliques ... (catalogue des démarches) (Procedure for archaeological metal-detector equipment)
Once you’ve confirmed where you’re allowed to hunt, LuckyFind helps you make the most of it — track your route on the map, log each find with its location, and revisit your saved hunt records. LuckyFind does not verify land access or grant detecting permission. Free for iPhone and Android.
New to LuckyFind? Follow the first-hunt checklist, then learn how to record a hunt and add finds.
Frequently Asked Questions
- Is ordinary metal detecting allowed in the French Southern Territories?
- A complete territory-wide rule has not been confirmed. The unresolved answer is not permission. Territorial access, heritage purpose, recovery methods, protected-area rules and rights over the find remain separate questions.
- Does permission to land include permission to use a detector?
- No detector or excavation permission follows merely from the land-access authorization described in Order 2022-102. Its district scopes and public-service, sovereignty and emergency exceptions must also be kept distinct from the rules governing the proposed activity.
- Do metropolitan France’s detector rules apply unchanged?
- That has not been established. The current Heritage Code territorial extensions and adaptations remain incomplete, so a metropolitan detector procedure is not a verified TAAF hobby-permit route.
- Do the same reserve rules cover every island and Terre Adélie?
- A single complete regime has not been established. The Southern reserve, Glorieuses, other Scattered Islands and Antarctic protected units have different instruments and unresolved current details. Access to one area does not settle activity in another.
- Can I keep treasure or a modern lost object?
- The archived Civil Code treasure rule requires a purely chance discovery of hidden or buried property with no established owner. It does not promise title after a planned search or govern every modern loss. Current special-property, archaeological and maritime qualifications remain unresolved.
- Must every find be reported within 48 hours?
- The Ministry’s general maritime cultural-property guidance gives that period from discovery or arrival at the first port, with a duty to leave qualifying property in place without damage. Its complete current TAAF adaptation has not been confirmed, and it is not established as a deadline for every modern lost object or land discovery.
Help keep these rules current
Report a change or mistake (opens your email app).
Your email goes to Stuck at Home LLC for manual review. Nothing changes automatically. Legal corrections are checked against official sources and independently reviewed before publication.
If the link does not work, email contact@getluckyfind.com with this page’s address, what looks wrong, and an official source link if you have one. Please leave out personal details and precise find locations.