Skip to content
Home › Guides › Laws around the world › Burundi

Metal Detecting Laws in Burundi

By the LuckyFind team Sourced from national law and official guidance
Sources checked October 12, 2026 ~6 min read

Ordinary hobby metal detecting in Burundi could not be resolved from the captured sources. Archaeological-purpose excavation requires authorization from the Ministre de la Culture (Culture Minister), while digging in covered forest domains has a separate forestry approval requirement. Discoveries that may interest history, prehistory, art or archaeology must be reported within eight days by registered letter. Permission to search or recover an object does not settle who owns it.

Can I detect in Burundi?

The short answer for each kind of land. Tap a card for the detail and the rule’s own words.

Open in many areas without a permitPermit, registration, or designated beaches onlyProhibited or effectively closed

The rules, land by land

Anywhere: national heritage law

No verdict yet

Ordinary metal detecting could not be resolved; archaeological-purpose digging requires heritage authorization.

  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • The Loi n°1/19 du 4 août 2023 portant modification du Code minier (Mining Code revision) addresses natural mineral substances and their prospecting and extraction. That separate framework is not treated as a licence for searching for every manufactured lost coin or ring; a complete recreational mineral-prospecting route was not verified.
  • A gap in detector-specific evidence is not permission to enter, dig, remove objects or keep finds. Heritage, forest, protected-area and landholder requirements can overlap.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“Nul ne peut effectuer sur un terrain lui appartenant ou appartenant à autrui des fouilles ou sondages à l'effet de rechercher des objets pouvant intéresser la préhistoire, l'histoire, l'art ou l'archéologie sans avoir obtenu l'autorisation du Ministre de la Culture.”

Keeping finds

No verdict yet

The complete ownership rules for lost and buried finds could not be confirmed.

  • The heritage law’s article34 places discoveries of historical, prehistoric, artistic or archaeological interest within the national cultural heritage and requires a classification decision. Article5 says classification may transfer property to the State; classification is not described as an automatic transfer in every case.
  • Article34 allows a reward fixed by the Culture Minister on the classification commission’s advice. It may consist of objects from the finder’s excavations which the State can relinquish, notably similar duplicates. A reward or return is discretionary, not a guaranteed finder share.
  • The Loi n°1/13 du 9 août 2011 portant révision du Code foncier (Land Code revision) addresses land ownership, the subsoil and accession. Those provisions and permission from a landholder do not establish a complete title rule for every lost movable object. The civil-code source was held and could not be retrieved; ordinary lost-property, treasure and prior-owner claims remain unresolved.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“Le classement d'un bien meuble ou immeuble peut opérer transfert de propriété à l'Etat.”

Reporting finds

Must be reported

Report potentially historic or archaeological discoveries to the Culture Minister within eight days by registered letter.

  • Article33 of the heritage law requires notice of any object that may interest history, prehistory, art or archaeology, whether found during authorized excavations or by chance. The recipient is the Ministre de la Culture (Culture Minister), the deadline is eight days and the specified method is registered letter.
  • This is the captured heritage duty, not a verified universal eight-day rule for every modern lost item. An ordinary police lost-property procedure, a current postal address and a digital substitute for registered notice were not verified. Reporting does not decide ownership or authorize further digging.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“Toute découverte d'objets pouvant intéresser l’histoire, la préhistoire, l'art ou l'archéologie, qu’elle intervienne au cours de fouilles autorisées ou fortuitement, doit être notifiée au Ministre de la Culture dans un délai de huit jours et par lettre recommandée.”

Lake & river shores

No verdict yet

Detecting and target recovery on inland lake shores remain unresolved.

  • This row concerns inland lake and river shores. The Land Code places lake beds and waters and specified shores within the natural public domain. Article197 recognizes normal non-exclusive use within the use appropriate to the land’s nature or allocation; that is not an express right to use a detector, dig a target or retain an object.
  • The extent of a particular shore strip and local access restrictions must not be assumed from public ownership. Protected lake areas, forest domains and classified heritage may add separate controls. No national beach-specific hobby detector authorization or prohibition was verified.
  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • A gap in detector-specific evidence is not permission to enter, dig, remove objects or keep finds. Heritage, forest, protected-area and landholder requirements can overlap.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“L’inaliénabilité du domaine public ne s’oppose pas à son utilisation normale et non privative n’excédant pas le droit d’usage pouvant être reconnu à tous en fonction de la nature ou de l’affectation du fonds.”

Protected monuments

No verdict yet

Protected heritage cannot be damaged, but a complete detector-use rule for classified sites was not verified.

  • Article 18 of the heritage law prohibits mutilating, altering, degrading or destroying a classified cultural property. Listed interventions also require prior Culture Minister authorization with the commission’s agreement. This damage and intervention provision is not expanded into a blanket rule for every non-disturbing detector sweep.
  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • Environment Code articles135–139 preserve heritage classification and allow a protected perimeter around classified immovable property, with restrictions set by a joint environment/culture order. The current orders, individual designations and activity conditions were not comprehensively captured. Visitor access does not establish recovery permission.
  • A gap in detector-specific evidence is not permission to enter, dig, remove objects or keep finds. Heritage, forest, protected-area and landholder requirements can overlap.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“Un bien classé ne peut être amputé, altéré, dégradé ou détruit ; il est interdit de l'utiliser pour des inscriptions, des graffiti ou des affichages.”

National parks & nature reserves

No verdict yet

Park conservation and access controls apply, but a complete hobby detecting rule across protected areas was not verified.

  • The Loi n°1/10 du 30 mai 2011 portant création et gestion des aires protégées (Law creating and managing protected areas) requires a management plan for each protected area. Its controlled renewable-resource use arrangements do not establish a public metal-detecting right.
  • Forest Code article111 excludes national parks from use rights, subject to special arrangements under the protected-areas law and management plans. Article112 prohibits listed exploitation and acts incompatible with conservation; article113 provides for specific entry, circulation and stay rules. Article117 separately requires ministerial authorization to enter or stay in a wildlife protection area and prohibits harm or disturbance to fauna or habitat.
  • Environment Code article133 provides for environment-administration authorization of human activity and public entry in designated strict reserves. Entry authorization is not target-recovery permission. The covered public-forest excavation rule also applies where the ground is within a forest domain, alongside the heritage excavation rules.
  • The distinct park, reserve and management-plan provisions were not collapsed into either a blanket detector ban or a promise of a hobby permit. Complete current unit rules, plans and authorizations were not captured.
  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • A gap in detector-specific evidence is not permission to enter, dig, remove objects or keep finds. Heritage, forest, protected-area and landholder requirements can overlap.
What the rule says
“Sous réserve des dispositions particulièrement aménagées dans la loi relative aux aires protégées au Burundi ou des prescriptions du plan d'aménagement, les parcs nationaux sont soustraits à tout droit d'usage.”

State forests

Permit required

Recovering a target by digging in covered public forest domains requires forestry authorization.

  • The Loi n°1/07 du 15 juillet 2016 portant révision du Code forestier (Law revising the Forest Code), article95, requires authorization from the minister responsible for forests before soil excavations in State, communal or public-establishment forest domains. It also covers private forest domains of at least half a hectare. A cutting or clearing permit is additionally required where applicable.
  • The row follows the rule for digging: detector sweeping is not expressly regulated by article95, but digging up any target in its covered forest domains needs authorization. It is not limited to archaeological excavation. This is not evidence that a hobby permit will necessarily be issued.
  • Article95 also requires protection of soils, surrounding vegetation, water quality and flows, and restoration of excavation or extraction sites after prospecting and exploitation work. Forestry authorization does not supply access rights or remove separate heritage and protected-area restrictions.
  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • The signed national scan and FAOLEX reproduction were compared at article95. The signed law commences on promulgation under article227. A current complete amendment set, application form, fees, duration and all local forest measures were not verified.
What the rule says
“obtenir l’autorisation du Ministre ayant les forêts dans ses attributions et, le cas échéant, un permis de coupe ou de défrichement ;”

Private land

No verdict yet

Landholder consent does not resolve every private-land detecting or recovery requirement.

  • Land Code articles12 and16 recognize land rights subject to other people’s rights and legal restrictions. Obtain lawful access from the relevant rights-holder; the captured provisions do not give the public a right to enter private land with a detector.
  • The Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) requires the Culture Minister’s authorization for excavations or trial digs intended to search for objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. Articles 29–30 concern the purpose of excavation; they do not expressly regulate every detector sweep or every search solely for a modern lost item.
  • For archaeological-purpose excavation by someone other than the owner, heritage article31 expressly requires the owner’s written consent with the permit application. That consent and the Culture Minister’s authorization are separate requirements.
  • Forest Code article95 additionally covers soil excavations in private forest domains of at least half a hectare. Protected-area or heritage classification can add restrictions. Neither an owner’s permission to search nor an excavation authorization determines ownership of every find.
  • The 1983 text is corroborated by the 2021 Environment Code and a government project framework dated April 2024. A UNESCO summary of the separate 2013 periodic report says the heritage law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. Presidency and official legal-portal retrieval failed at robots endpoints, and the later UNESCO report download was disallowed. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders were not established.
What the rule says
“Lorsque la demande d'autorisation de fouille émane d'une personne autre que le propriétaire du terrain le consentement écrit de ce dernier doit être joint à la demande.”

Even where detecting is allowed, archaeological and historic sites are protected, and you must fill every hole and follow posted rules. Always confirm the current rule with the land manager.

Detecting beyond Burundi? We cover 207 more countries rule by rule too. See the world map →

Open data: every rule in our Burundi guide, with its quote, source and check date, free to reuse (CC BY-SA 4.0). Download the data →

Please read: this is general information for detectorists, not legal advice. Rules change and vary by individual park, city, and agency. We cite the official sources below, but always confirm the current rule with the specific land manager before you detect — and when in doubt, ask first. Sources checked October 12, 2026; see the source notes for scope.

The national rule and current-law limits

Articles 29–30 of the Loi n°1/6 du 25 mai 1983 portant protection du patrimoine Culturel National (Law protecting the national cultural heritage) require authorization from the Culture Minister for excavations or trial digs intended to seek objects of prehistoric, historical, artistic or archaeological interest. The purpose of the digging matters: this is not an express rule for every detector sweep or every search solely for a recent lost item.

Natural-mineral prospecting is separate. The Loi n°1/19 du 4 août 2023 portant modification de la loi n°1/21 du 15 octobre 2013 portant Code minier du Burundi (Law revising the Mining Code) addresses natural mineral substances and their prospecting and extraction. It is not treated as a license for searching for every manufactured coin or ring; a complete recreational prospecting route was not verified.

The 1983 heritage text is corroborated by the Loi n°1/09 du 25 mai 2021 portant modification du Code de l’environnement de la République du Burundi (Law revising the Environment Code) and an April 2024 government project framework. A UNESCO summary of Burundi’s separate 2013 periodic report says the law was revised for intangible heritage, but the enacted amendment was not identified. This is not the summary of the later 2023 report. A complete current consolidation and all implementing orders remain unverified.

Classified monuments and heritage places

Article 18 of the heritage law prohibits mutilating, altering, degrading or destroying classified cultural property. Listed interventions also require prior authorization from the Culture Minister, with the agreement of the Commission de classement des biens culturels (cultural-property classification commission). These protections do not establish a complete rule for every non-disturbing detector sweep at a classified site.

Articles 135–139 of the 2021 Environment Code retain heritage-classification controls and allow a protected perimeter around classified immovable property through a joint environment and culture order. The applicable orders, designations and activity conditions were not comprehensively captured.

Visitor access is not recovery permission. Archaeological-purpose digging still requires the heritage authorization, and forest or protected-area controls can overlap. The complete detector-use rule for classified sites remains unresolved.

Digging in forest domains

Article 95 of the Loi n°1/07 du 15 juillet 2016 portant révision du Code forestier (Law revising the Forest Code) requires authorization from the minister responsible for forests before soil excavation in State, communal or public-establishment forest domains. It also covers private forest domains of at least half a hectare. A cutting or clearing permit is additionally required where applicable.

This digging rule is not confined to archaeology. Recovering a buried target in a covered forest domain requires authorization even though article 95 does not expressly regulate detector sweeping. It does not establish that an ordinary hobby application will necessarily be approved.

Article 95 also requires protection of soils, surrounding vegetation, water quality and flows, and restoration of excavation or extraction sites after prospecting and exploitation work. Forestry approval supplies neither land access nor an exemption from heritage or protected-area controls. Current forms, fees, duration, the complete amendment set and all local measures were not verified.

Parks, reserves and other protected areas

The Loi n°1/10 du 30 mai 2011 portant création et gestion des aires protégées au Burundi (Law creating and managing protected areas) requires a management plan for each protected area. Its arrangements for controlled renewable-resource use do not establish a public detector right.

Forest Code article 111 excludes national parks from use rights, subject to special arrangements under the protected-areas law and management plans. Articles 112–113 address exploitation, acts incompatible with conservation, and specific entry, circulation and stay rules. Article 117 separately requires ministerial authorization to enter or stay in a wildlife protection area and prohibits harm or disturbance to wildlife or habitat.

Environment Code article 133 provides for environment-administration authorization of human activity and public entry in designated strict reserves. Entry authorization does not itself authorize target recovery. The covered forest-domain excavation rule and heritage-purpose excavation rule may also apply.

A complete hobby detecting rule across these different designations was not verified. Current unit rules, management plans and authorizations remain incomplete; the separate controls cannot be turned into either a blanket detector ban or a promise of a hobby permit.

Inland lake and river shores

The shore question here concerns inland lakes and rivers. The Loi n°1/13 du 9 août 2011 portant révision du Code foncier du Burundi (Law revising the Land Code) places lake beds, waters and specified shores within the natural public domain. Article 197 recognizes normal, non-exclusive use within the use appropriate to the land’s nature or allocation.

That qualified public use is not an express right to detect, dig a target or keep an object. Public ownership does not establish the extent of a particular shore strip or remove local access restrictions. Protected lake areas, forest domains and classified heritage may add controls. A national shore-specific hobby detector rule remains unresolved.

Private land and separate permissions

Land Code articles 12 and 16 recognize land rights subject to other people’s rights and legal restrictions. Obtain lawful access from the relevant rights-holder; these provisions do not give visitors a public right to enter private land with a detector. The complete private-land detecting question remains unresolved.

Heritage article 31 expressly requires an owner’s written consent to accompany an archaeological-excavation application made by someone else. That consent is separate from the Culture Minister’s authorization under articles 29–30. Neither requirement can substitute for the other.

Forest Code article 95 also covers excavation in private forest domains of at least half a hectare, and protected-area or heritage classification can add restrictions. An owner’s permission to search and an excavation authorization do not determine ownership of every object found.

Keeping finds and possible rewards

The complete ownership rules for ordinary lost property, buried treasure and prior-owner claims could not be confirmed. Land Code provisions on land, subsoil and accession do not establish a complete title rule for every lost movable object. No automatic finder or landowner entitlement is asserted.

Heritage article 34 places discoveries of historical, prehistoric, artistic or archaeological interest within the national cultural heritage and requires a classification decision. Article 5 says classification may transfer ownership to the State. It does not say that every classification automatically does so.

Article 34 allows a reward fixed by the Culture Minister on the classification commission’s advice. It may include objects from the finder’s excavations that the State can relinquish, notably similar duplicates. A reward or return is discretionary; no guaranteed percentage or finder’s share was established.

Reporting a heritage discovery

Under heritage article 33, any discovery of an object that may interest history, prehistory, art or archaeology must be notified to the Culture Minister within eight days by registered letter. The duty covers both authorized excavations and chance discoveries.

This is the captured heritage duty, not a verified universal eight-day rule for every modern lost item. An ordinary police lost-property procedure, a current postal address and a digital substitute for registered notice were not verified. Reporting does not establish ownership or authorize further digging.

The unresolved detector, ownership and current-law questions remain evidence limits. Missing evidence is not permission to enter, dig, remove an object or keep it; the applicable landholder, heritage, forestry and protected-area requirements must be considered together.

Sources

Official and statutory sources this page is based on (source check: October 12, 2026):

Keep your permitted Burundi spots organized

Once you’ve confirmed where you’re allowed to hunt, LuckyFind helps you make the most of it — track your route on the map, log each find with its location, and revisit your saved hunt records. LuckyFind does not verify land access or grant detecting permission. Free for iPhone and Android.

New to LuckyFind? Follow the first-hunt checklist, then learn how to record a hunt and add finds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is ordinary metal detecting allowed in Burundi?
The general hobby rule could not be resolved. The captured heritage law requires authorization for archaeological-purpose excavations or trial digs, but does not expressly settle every detector sweep or search solely for a recent lost item.
Do I need permission to dig up a target in a forest?
Article 95 requires forestry authorization for soil excavation in covered State, communal and public-establishment forest domains, and private forest domains of at least half a hectare. It is not limited to archaeology. Approval and any additional cutting or clearing permit are not guaranteed.
Is the owner’s permission enough on private land?
It does not resolve every requirement. An archaeological-excavation application by someone other than the owner must include the owner’s written consent, separately from Culture Minister authorization. Forest or protected-area restrictions may also apply.
Can I keep a find or claim a fixed reward?
No complete ordinary-find ownership rule or fixed finder’s share was verified. Heritage classification may transfer property to the State, but not automatically in every case. The heritage law’s possible reward is discretionary.
How quickly must I report a historic or archaeological discovery?
The captured heritage law requires notification to the Culture Minister within eight days by registered letter, including for chance discoveries. A current postal address or digital substitute was not verified. This is not a universal reporting rule for every modern lost item.
Can I detect on a lake shore or in a park?
A complete hobby rule for inland shores and protected areas was not verified. Qualified public use, entry permission and management-plan resource use do not by themselves authorize detecting, target recovery or keeping a find. Forest and heritage controls may apply separately.

Find more, remember where

Download LuckyFind — free for iPhone and Android — to track your routes, log your finds, and keep your permitted spots organized.

Download LuckyFind on the App Store Get LuckyFind on Google Play

Metal detecting laws in other countries

← Every country we cover, on one map

United States · Canada · UK · Australia · Afghanistan · Albania · Algeria · Andorra · Angola · Antigua and Barbuda · Argentina · Armenia · Austria · Azerbaijan · Bahamas · Bahrain · Bangladesh · Barbados · Belarus · Belgium · Belize · Benin · Bhutan · Bolivia · Bosnia and Herzegovina · Botswana · Brazil · Brunei · Bulgaria · Burkina Faso · Cabo Verde · Cambodia · Cameroon · Central African Republic · Chad · Chile · China · Colombia · Comoros · Costa Rica · Côte d’Ivoire · Croatia · Cuba · Cyprus · Czechia · Democratic Republic of the Congo · Denmark · Djibouti · Dominica · Dominican Republic · Ecuador · Egypt · El Salvador · Equatorial Guinea · Eritrea · Estonia · Eswatini · Ethiopia · Falkland Islands · Faroe Islands · Fiji · Finland · France · French Southern Territories · Gabon · Gambia · Georgia · Germany · Ghana · Greece · Greenland · Grenada · Guatemala · Guernsey · Guinea · Guinea-Bissau · Guyana · Haiti · Honduras · Hong Kong · Hungary · Iceland · India · Indonesia · Iran · Iraq · Ireland · Isle of Man · Israel · Italy · Jamaica · Japan · Jersey · Jordan · Kazakhstan · Kenya · Kiribati · Kosovo · Kuwait · Kyrgyzstan · Laos · Latvia · Lebanon · Lesotho · Liberia · Libya · Liechtenstein · Lithuania · Luxembourg · Madagascar · Malawi · Malaysia · Maldives · Mali · Malta · Marshall Islands · Mauritania · Mauritius · Mexico · Micronesia · Moldova · Monaco · Mongolia · Montenegro · Morocco · Mozambique · Myanmar · Namibia · Nauru · Nepal · Netherlands · New Caledonia · New Zealand · Nicaragua · Niger · Nigeria · North Korea · North Macedonia · Norway · Oman · Pakistan · Palau · Palestine · Panama · Papua New Guinea · Paraguay · Peru · Philippines · Poland · Portugal · Puerto Rico · Qatar · Republic of the Congo · Romania · Russia · Rwanda · Saint Kitts and Nevis · Saint Lucia · Saint Vincent and the Grenadines · Samoa · San Marino · São Tomé and Príncipe · Saudi Arabia · Senegal · Serbia · Seychelles · Sierra Leone · Singapore · Slovakia · Slovenia · Solomon Islands · Somalia · South Africa · South Korea · South Sudan · Spain · Sri Lanka · Sudan · Suriname · Sweden · Switzerland · Syria · Taiwan · Tajikistan · Tanzania · Thailand · Timor-Leste · Togo · Tonga · Trinidad and Tobago · Tunisia · Turkey · Turkmenistan · Tuvalu · Uganda · Ukraine · United Arab Emirates · Uruguay · Uzbekistan · Vanuatu · Vatican City · Venezuela · Vietnam · Western Sahara · Yemen · Zambia · Zimbabwe

More guides

Help keep these rules current

Report a change or mistake (opens your email app).

Your email goes to Stuck at Home LLC for manual review. Nothing changes automatically. Legal corrections are checked against official sources and independently reviewed before publication.

If the link does not work, email contact@getluckyfind.com with this page’s address, what looks wrong, and an official source link if you have one. Please leave out personal details and precise find locations.