Skip to content

Metal Detecting Laws in Comoros

Sources checked October 13, 2026 ~6 min read

A complete current hobby-detecting rule could not be confirmed for the Union of the Comoros. Two national park decrees restrict works and recovery activities, but neither establishes an available recreational detector permit. Permission to enter, search or dig is separate from ownership of a find. This guide does not extend Comorian rules to Mayotte.

Can I detect in Comoros?

The short answer for each kind of land. Tap a card for the detail and the rule’s own words.

Open in many areas without a permitPermit, registration, or designated beaches onlyProhibited or effectively closed

The rules, land by land

Anywhere: national heritage law

No verdict yet

A complete current national hobby-detecting rule could not be confirmed.

  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • The older 1994 heritage law, Articles 30–32, required a written culture-minister license for archaeological explorations and excavations and scientific competence. That purpose-specific rule is distinct from looking for modern lost coins or jewelry; its current effect after the 2020 law is unresolved. The 1954 mineral legislation concerns natural mineral substances and does not establish a hobby detector license.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Selon la loi N° 20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020, portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores :”

Keeping finds

No verdict yet

Finding an object does not establish a verified current right to keep it.

  • The ministry-hosted Code civil (Civil Code), Article 716, allocates a qualifying chance-found treasure to the finder on the finder’s own land, or half to the finder and half to the landowner on another person’s land. Its definition requires a hidden or buried thing for which nobody can prove ownership and discovery by pure chance; intentional detector searches do not automatically qualify.
  • Article 717 leaves sea-washed objects and unclaimed lost things to special laws. Article 2279 allows an owner to reclaim lost or stolen property within three years of loss or theft; that provision alone does not award every find to the finder after three years. The compilation is not a verified complete current code.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Le trésor est toute chose cachée ou enfouie sur laquelle personne ne peut justifier sa propriété, et qui est découverte par le pur effet du hasard.”

Reporting finds

No verdict yet

Current find-reporting recipients and deadlines remain unresolved.

  • The older 1994 heritage law, Article 31, required the finder or owner to report chance discoveries potentially relevant to art, history or archaeology immediately to the local administration, which notified the culture minister. This is historical evidence only because the complete 2020 heritage law was not obtained. No current general police deadline for every ordinary lost object was verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • The Civil Code’s lost-property and treasure provisions do not by themselves specify a complete reporting procedure. Reporting or handing over an object is distinct from acquiring title to it.
What the rule says
“Les découvertes fortuites d’objets mobiliers ou immobiliers pouvant intéresser l’art, l’histoire ou l’archéologie doivent être déclarées immédiatement par l’inventeur ou le proprié- taire à l’administration locale, qui en avise le Ministre de la culture.”

Beaches & foreshore

No verdict yet

No general recreational beach-detecting permission was verified.

  • The current environmental text, Article 120, penalizes removal of materials from the seashore. This does not by itself establish that every detector sweep or every small target-recovery hole is the regulated removal of shore materials; no blanket beach-detecting status is inferred. The older public-domain decree’s provisions for public use likewise do not grant a detector or recovery right.
  • Protected coastal parks have additional rules. The Mitsamiouli-Ndroude decree controls works that alter the state or appearance of the place and has specific shore-material and coral provisions. Its park authorization provision must not be read as displacing the later environmental law. Confirm the site and proposed recovery activity with the competent authority.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Le prélèvement de matériaux du rivage de la mer est puni d’un emprisonnement de six (6) mois à trois (3) ans et d’une amende de cinq cent mille (500 000) à cinq millions (5 000 000.KMF) ou de l’une de ces peines.”

Protected monuments

No verdict yet

Current detecting and excavation controls at protected heritage places need confirmation.

  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • The older 1994 law distinguished classified property from other objects and required authorization for modifications and archaeological explorations or excavations. A current classification, site boundary, search authorization and recovery conditions must be established from the newer heritage regime; no general visitor or landowner permission is inferred.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Selon la loi N° 20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020, portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores :”

National parks & nature reserves

No verdict yet

A single national detecting rule for all protected areas remains unresolved.

  • The environmental law, Article 83, refers designation, management and conservation to the special national protected-area law. The institutional index identifies Loi n°18-005/AU du 5 décembre 2018 sur le Système National des Aires Protégées des Comores (National Protected Areas System Law), promulgated by Decree 19-129/PR of November 26, 2019, but its full operative text was not captured. The accessible index contains headings, not the legal provisions.
  • The Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (Comoros National Parks Agency) describes six parks managed with village communities. Two captured 2022 park decrees separately restrict works, heritage damage and reserve activities and assign local visitor conditions. Those two park rules do not prove that every protected area has identical detecting rules.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Le classement, pour chaque site ou zone choisi, la gestion et la conservation des aires protégées relèvent de la loi relative au système national des aires protégées.”

Detecting

No verdict yet

Parc National Mont Ntringui (Mont Ntringui National Park): permission for recreational detecting and target recovery could not be confirmed.

  • Scope: Parc National Mont Ntringui (Mont Ntringui National Park), under its May 23, 2022 creation decree. Article 36 requires prior authorization from the Direction de l’Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (management of the Comoros National Parks Agency) for public or private works likely to change the state or appearance of the place and prohibits works likely to destroy the park’s ecological or landscape character. Any proposed target recovery covered by that works provision needs authorization. The provision does not expressly regulate detector sweeps or establish that an ordinary recreational recovery qualifies for authorization.
  • Article 37 requires consistency with the park development program and conservation prescriptions. Work outside that program must fit the decree’s objectives and be based on an environmental impact study. Except in urbanized zones, eligible works are limited to scientific purposes, necessary visitor-management or park operations, renovation/modification/extension of existing buildings, improvement of existing paths, land restoration and erosion control, or maintenance and restoration of public works. This does not establish an available recreational detector permit. Ordinary hobby recovery is not among the listed work categories.
  • Articles 4–5 prohibit all removal or extraction within internal reserves, subject to the stated conservator-authorized management, research, monitoring, training and environmental-education exceptions and park-program requirements. Ecotourism by village communities or with their agreement is separately subject to case-by-case agency approval. Articles 42–43 provide for agency-authorized research, monitoring, training and environmental education, with scientific advice where appropriate and compliance with the park development program; scientific observation, research and monitoring require a preliminary agreement with the research organization. These exceptions do not establish general recreational recovery permission.
  • Article 31 separately prohibits harm to cultural or historical heritage and archaeological remains unless authorized by the park conservator. It does not itself establish an ordinary detecting authorization.
  • Visitor access, entry fees and continuing community activities remain subject to park rules. Complete current zoning, management plans and later individual decisions were not obtained. Confirm both the location and activity with the agency before any recovery.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“aucune activité de travaux publics ou privés susceptible de modifier l’état ou l’aspect des lieux ne peut être exécutée sans autorisation préalable de la direction de l’Agence.”

Detecting

No verdict yet

Parc National Mitsamiouli-Ndroude (Mitsamiouli-Ndroude National Park): permission for recreational detecting and target recovery could not be confirmed.

  • Scope: Parc National Mitsamiouli-Ndroude (Mitsamiouli-Ndroude National Park), under its May 23, 2022 creation decree. Article 36 requires prior authorization from the Direction de l’Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (management of the Comoros National Parks Agency) for public or private works likely to change the state or appearance of the place and prohibits works likely to destroy the park’s ecological or landscape character. Any proposed target recovery covered by that works provision needs authorization. The provision does not expressly regulate detector sweeps or establish that an ordinary recreational recovery qualifies for authorization.
  • Article 37 requires consistency with the park development program and conservation prescriptions. Work outside that program must fit the decree’s objectives and be based on an environmental impact study. Except in urbanized zones, eligible works are limited to scientific purposes, necessary visitor-management or park operations, renovation/modification/extension of existing buildings, improvement of existing paths, land restoration and erosion control, or maintenance and restoration of public works. This does not establish an available recreational detector permit. Ordinary hobby recovery is not among the listed work categories.
  • Articles 4–5 prohibit all removal or extraction within internal reserves, subject to the stated conservator-authorized management, research, monitoring, training and environmental-education exceptions and park-program requirements. Ecotourism by village communities or with their agreement is separately subject to case-by-case agency approval. Articles 43–44 provide for agency-authorized research, monitoring, training and environmental education, with scientific advice where appropriate and compliance with the park development program; scientific observation, research and monitoring require a preliminary agreement with the research organization. These exceptions do not establish general recreational recovery permission.
  • Article 31 separately prohibits harm to cultural or historical heritage and archaeological remains unless authorized by the park conservator. It does not itself establish an ordinary detecting authorization.
  • Article 34 separately prohibits removing seashore materials within or around the park without park-management authorization and strictly prohibits removing living or dead coral. The later environmental law, Article 120, penalizes removal of seashore materials; the earlier park clause does not establish an exception to that later law.
  • Visitor access, entry fees and continuing community activities remain subject to park rules. Complete current zoning, management plans and later individual decisions were not obtained. Confirm both the location and activity with the agency before any recovery.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“aucune activité de travaux publics ou privés susceptible de modifier l’état ou l’aspect des lieux ne peut être exécutée sans autorisation préalable de la direction de l’Agence.”

Digging

No verdict yet

Parc National Mont Ntringui (Mont Ntringui National Park): a recreational target-recovery authorization could not be confirmed.

  • Scope: Parc National Mont Ntringui (Mont Ntringui National Park), under its May 23, 2022 creation decree. Article 36 requires prior authorization from the Direction de l’Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (management of the Comoros National Parks Agency) for public or private works likely to change the state or appearance of the place and prohibits works likely to destroy the park’s ecological or landscape character. Any proposed target recovery covered by that works provision needs authorization. The provision does not expressly regulate detector sweeps or establish that an ordinary recreational recovery qualifies for authorization.
  • Article 37 requires consistency with the park development program and conservation prescriptions. Work outside that program must fit the decree’s objectives and be based on an environmental impact study. Except in urbanized zones, eligible works are limited to scientific purposes, necessary visitor-management or park operations, renovation/modification/extension of existing buildings, improvement of existing paths, land restoration and erosion control, or maintenance and restoration of public works. This does not establish an available recreational detector permit. Ordinary hobby recovery is not among the listed work categories.
  • Articles 4–5 prohibit all removal or extraction within internal reserves, subject to the stated conservator-authorized management, research, monitoring, training and environmental-education exceptions and park-program requirements. Ecotourism by village communities or with their agreement is separately subject to case-by-case agency approval. Articles 42–43 provide for agency-authorized research, monitoring, training and environmental education, with scientific advice where appropriate and compliance with the park development program; scientific observation, research and monitoring require a preliminary agreement with the research organization. These exceptions do not establish general recreational recovery permission.
  • Article 31 separately prohibits harm to cultural or historical heritage and archaeological remains unless authorized by the park conservator. It does not itself establish an ordinary detecting authorization.
  • Visitor access, entry fees and continuing community activities remain subject to park rules. Complete current zoning, management plans and later individual decisions were not obtained. Confirm both the location and activity with the agency before any recovery.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“aucune activité de travaux publics ou privés susceptible de modifier l’état ou l’aspect des lieux ne peut être exécutée sans autorisation préalable de la direction de l’Agence.”

Digging

No verdict yet

Parc National Mitsamiouli-Ndroude (Mitsamiouli-Ndroude National Park): a recreational target-recovery authorization could not be confirmed.

  • Scope: Parc National Mitsamiouli-Ndroude (Mitsamiouli-Ndroude National Park), under its May 23, 2022 creation decree. Article 36 requires prior authorization from the Direction de l’Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (management of the Comoros National Parks Agency) for public or private works likely to change the state or appearance of the place and prohibits works likely to destroy the park’s ecological or landscape character. Any proposed target recovery covered by that works provision needs authorization. The provision does not expressly regulate detector sweeps or establish that an ordinary recreational recovery qualifies for authorization.
  • Article 37 requires consistency with the park development program and conservation prescriptions. Work outside that program must fit the decree’s objectives and be based on an environmental impact study. Except in urbanized zones, eligible works are limited to scientific purposes, necessary visitor-management or park operations, renovation/modification/extension of existing buildings, improvement of existing paths, land restoration and erosion control, or maintenance and restoration of public works. This does not establish an available recreational detector permit. Ordinary hobby recovery is not among the listed work categories.
  • Articles 4–5 prohibit all removal or extraction within internal reserves, subject to the stated conservator-authorized management, research, monitoring, training and environmental-education exceptions and park-program requirements. Ecotourism by village communities or with their agreement is separately subject to case-by-case agency approval. Articles 43–44 provide for agency-authorized research, monitoring, training and environmental education, with scientific advice where appropriate and compliance with the park development program; scientific observation, research and monitoring require a preliminary agreement with the research organization. These exceptions do not establish general recreational recovery permission.
  • Article 31 separately prohibits harm to cultural or historical heritage and archaeological remains unless authorized by the park conservator. It does not itself establish an ordinary detecting authorization.
  • Article 34 separately prohibits removing seashore materials within or around the park without park-management authorization and strictly prohibits removing living or dead coral. The later environmental law, Article 120, penalizes removal of seashore materials; the earlier park clause does not establish an exception to that later law.
  • Visitor access, entry fees and continuing community activities remain subject to park rules. Complete current zoning, management plans and later individual decisions were not obtained. Confirm both the location and activity with the agency before any recovery.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“aucune activité de travaux publics ou privés susceptible de modifier l’état ou l’aspect des lieux ne peut être exécutée sans autorisation préalable de la direction de l’Agence.”

State forests

No verdict yet

The forestry law does not establish a general hobby-detecting permission.

  • Loi n°12-001/AU du 9 juin 2012 relative à la gestion forestière (Forest Management Law) covers public and private forests. Articles 46–51 provide management plans and different managers; Article 52 empowers the forest minister to prohibit work harmful to soil or ecological balance. Article 55 requires prior ministerial authorization and an environmental impact study for clearing a classified forest. Those provisions are not an express rule for every detector sweep or every recovery hole.
  • Special protection regimes and management instruments may impose further controls. Article 99 repeals listed older forest instruments and, generally, pre-promulgation forest regulations; those old texts cannot be assumed current. The later environmental law, Article 73, refers forest management and exploitation to the special forest law. Current unit plans and a specific recreational detecting procedure were not obtained.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“Le Ministre chargé des forêts peut interdire les travaux nuisibles aux sols et à l’équilibre écologique et plus généralement prendre toutes mesures utiles à la protection des forêts.”

Private land

No verdict yet

Landowner agreement does not settle the complete legal position for detecting.

  • Civil Code Article 544 makes enjoyment and disposal of property subject to laws and regulations; Article 552 includes the surface and subsurface subject to mining and police-law qualifications. Arrange lawful access with the rights-holder. Neither provision supplies an express detector license or makes the finder the owner of recovered objects.
  • The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older 1994 law were not obtained. The older Justice Ministry text is therefore historical context, not a verified current permit, ownership or reporting procedure.
  • Forests and protected parks can include additional controls despite private ownership. The forest law provides private-forest management plans, and the two captured park decrees expressly regulate public and private works.
  • The environmental framework was amended and supplemented by Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024, promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
  • Scope: the Union of the Comoros national framework. These captures do not establish a complete set of current island, municipal or site rules, and no rule here is extended to Mayotte. Public ownership, visitor access and permission to search do not establish ownership of a find.
What the rule says
“La propriété est le droit de jouir et disposer des choses de la manière la plus absolue, pourvu qu’on n’en fasse pas un usage prohibé par les lois ou par les règlements.”

Even where detecting is allowed, archaeological and historic sites are protected, and you must fill every hole and follow posted rules. Always confirm the current rule with the land manager.

Detecting beyond Comoros? We cover 207 more countries rule by rule too. See the world map →

Open data: every rule in our Comoros guide, with its quote, source and check date, free to reuse (CC BY-SA 4.0). Download the data →

Please read: this is general information for detectorists, not legal advice. Rules change and vary by individual park, city, and agency. We cite the official sources below, but always confirm the current rule with the specific land manager before you detect — and when in doubt, ask first. Sources checked October 13, 2026; see the source notes for scope.

National detecting and the heritage-law gap

The Banque Centrale des Comores (Central Bank of Comoros) museum dossier identifies Loi n°20-033/AU du 29 décembre 2020 portant protection du patrimoine national culturel et naturel en Union des Comores (National Cultural and Natural Heritage Protection Law). Its complete operative text, implementing measures and precise relationship to the older law were not obtained. A current archaeological-search authorization route could not be confirmed.

The older Loi n°94-022 du 27 juin 1994 portant protection du patrimoine culturel national (National Cultural Heritage Protection Law), articles 30–32, required a written culture-minister license for archaeological explorations and excavations and scientific competence. That is historical context, not a verified current permit procedure. Its archaeological purpose is also distinct from searching for modern lost coins or jewelry.

No complete current hobby permit issuer, application form, fee or duration was verified. The missing newer heritage text prevents treating the older procedure as an available license. Absence of a confirmed detector rule does not establish permission to search, dig or remove an object.

Monuments and archaeological places

The older 1994 heritage law distinguished classified property from other objects and required authorization for modifications and archaeological explorations or excavations. Its present effect after the 2020 law remains unresolved. A current classification, boundary, search authorization and recovery conditions must be established under the newer regime.

Visitor admission and landowner agreement do not supply that missing legal position. A complete current rule for detecting or excavation at protected heritage places could not be confirmed. Separate national park restrictions may also apply where a heritage place lies within a park.

Beaches and the environmental law

The Loi n°24-018/AU du 25 décembre 2024 modifiant et complétant la Loi Cadre n°94-018/AF relative à l’environnement (Law amending and supplementing the Environmental Framework Law) was promulgated by Décret n°25-004/PR du 22 janvier 2025 (Promulgation Decree). Article 120 penalizes removal of materials from the seashore. It does not by itself establish that every detector sweep or every small target-recovery hole falls within that activity.

A blanket recreational beach-detecting permission or prohibition could not be confirmed. Older public-domain provisions for public use do not grant a detector or recovery right. Protected coastal parks add their own works, shore-material and coral restrictions, which do not displace the later environmental law.

Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply. It is not a general suspension of all protection or a visitor exemption. Article 127 repeals contrary earlier provisions; complete later implementing measures were not verified.

National parks: a general rule remains unresolved

Article 83 of the environmental law refers designation, management and conservation to the special protected-area law. An institutional index identifies Loi n°18-005/AU du 5 décembre 2018 sur le Système National des Aires Protégées des Comores (National Protected Areas System Law), promulgated by Decree 19-129/PR of November 26, 2019. Its full operative text was not captured; the accessible index contains headings rather than the provisions.

The Agence Parcs Nationaux des Comores (Comoros National Parks Agency) describes six parks managed with village communities. Two captured 2022 decrees provide the specific restrictions discussed below. Those two decrees do not establish identical detecting rules for every protected area, and visitor access is not permission to recover a target.

Mont Ntringui and Mitsamiouli-Ndroude: restricted works

The Décret n°22-043/PR du 23 mai 2022 portant création du Parc National Mont Ntringui (Decree establishing Mont Ntringui National Park) and Décret n°22-046/PR du 23 mai 2022 portant création du Parc National Mitsamiouli-Ndroude (Decree establishing Mitsamiouli-Ndroude National Park) each regulate public and private works. Article 36 requires prior authorization from agency management for works likely to change the state or appearance of the place and prohibits works likely to destroy the park’s ecological or landscape character.

A proposed target recovery covered by that works provision needs authorization. The provision does not expressly regulate detector sweeps or establish that an ordinary recreational recovery qualifies for authorization. Permission for recreational detecting and digging therefore remains unconfirmed in both parks.

Article 37 requires consistency with the park development program and conservation prescriptions. Work outside the program must fit the decree’s objectives and be based on an environmental impact study. Except in urbanized zones, eligible works are limited to scientific purposes, necessary visitor-management or park operations, renovation, modification or extension of existing buildings, improvement of existing paths, land restoration and erosion control, or maintenance and restoration of public works.

Ordinary hobby recovery is not among those listed categories. The urbanized-zone exception does not itself establish a hobby permit. Complete current zoning, management plans and later individual decisions were not obtained, so confirm both the location and the proposed activity with the agency before any recovery.

Additional restrictions inside the two parks

Articles 4–5 of both decrees prohibit all removal or extraction within internal reserves, subject to the stated conservator-authorized management, research, monitoring, training and environmental-education exceptions and park-program requirements. Ecotourism by village communities or with their agreement is separately subject to case-by-case agency approval. These purpose-specific exceptions do not establish general recreational recovery permission.

Articles 42–43 of the Mont Ntringui decree and articles 43–44 of the Mitsamiouli-Ndroude decree provide for agency-authorized research, monitoring, training and environmental education, with scientific advice where appropriate and compliance with the park development program. Scientific observation, research and monitoring require a preliminary agreement with the research organization. This is not an established ordinary hobby authorization route.

Article 31 of each decree separately prohibits harm to cultural or historical heritage and archaeological remains unless the park conservator authorizes it. That provision does not itself establish an ordinary detecting authorization. Visitor access, entry fees and continuing community activities remain subject to park rules.

Article 34 of the Mitsamiouli-Ndroude decree prohibits removing seashore materials within or around the park without park-management authorization and strictly prohibits removing living or dead coral. The earlier park authorization clause does not establish an exception to the later environmental law’s article 120. A park permission should not be treated as resolving that separate shore-material rule.

Public and private forests

The Loi n°12-001/AU du 9 juin 2012 relative à la gestion forestière (Forest Management Law) covers public and private forests. Articles 46–51 provide for management plans and different managers. Article 52 empowers the forest minister to prohibit work harmful to soil or ecological balance; article 55 requires prior ministerial authorization and an environmental impact study for clearing a classified forest.

These provisions do not expressly settle every detector sweep or recovery hole. Special protection regimes and management instruments may impose further controls. Current unit plans and a specific recreational detecting procedure were not obtained.

Article 99 repeals listed older forest instruments and, generally, forest regulations predating promulgation, so older texts cannot simply be assumed current. Article 73 of the later environmental law refers forest management and exploitation to the special forest law. Neither point establishes hobby-detecting permission.

Private land and access

The ministry-hosted Code civil (Civil Code), article 544, makes enjoyment and disposal of property subject to laws and regulations. Article 552 includes the surface and subsurface, subject to mining and police-law qualifications. The compilation is not a verified complete current code, and neither provision supplies an express detector license or makes the finder the owner of recovered objects.

Arrange lawful access with the rights-holder. Landowner agreement does not settle the unresolved heritage rules, any forest management requirements or protected-park controls. The two captured park decrees expressly regulate public and private works, and the forest law provides for private-forest management plans.

Keeping treasure and ordinary lost objects

Article 716 of the captured Civil Code allocates qualifying chance-found treasure to the finder on the finder’s own land, or half to the finder and half to the landowner on another person’s land. Its definition requires a hidden or buried thing for which nobody can prove ownership and discovery by pure chance. Intentional detector searches do not automatically qualify.

Article 717 leaves sea-washed objects and unclaimed lost things to special laws. Article 2279 allows an owner to reclaim lost or stolen property within three years of loss or theft; that provision alone does not award every find to the finder after three years.

The code compilation is not a verified complete current text, and the complete 2020 heritage law was not obtained. These provisions therefore do not establish a complete current right to keep a discovery. Public ownership of land, permission to search and handing over or reporting an object do not by themselves establish the finder’s title.

Reporting discoveries

Article 31 of the older 1994 heritage law required the finder or owner to report chance discoveries potentially relevant to art, history or archaeology immediately to the local administration, which notified the culture minister. This is historical evidence only: the complete newer heritage law and its precise relationship to that procedure were not obtained.

A current reporting recipient and deadline could not be confirmed, including a general police deadline for every ordinary lost object. The Civil Code’s lost-property and treasure provisions do not themselves supply a complete reporting procedure. This uncertainty should not be read as a conclusion that reporting is optional or that a find may be kept.

Before planning a search

Confirm lawful entry, the site’s applicable rules and whether the proposed search or recovery needs separate authorization. For the two named parks, the captured works provisions have restricted purposes and do not establish an available recreational permit. Knowing that a park admits visitors is not enough to resolve the recovery question.

The general detecting, keeping and reporting rules remain unresolved, as do complete current conditions for protected heritage places, beaches, forests, parks and private land. Current island, municipal and site rules were not comprehensively established. This guide concerns the Union of the Comoros and does not extend its rules to Mayotte.

Sources

Official and statutory sources this page is based on (source check: October 13, 2026):

Complete current hobby-detecting and finds rules remain unresolved. The two captured park decrees restrict covered works, internal-reserve activities and heritage harm without establishing an available recreational permit. The missing operative 2020 heritage law, incomplete local rules and source-currentness limits prevent broader conclusions.

Keep your permitted Comoros spots organized

Once you’ve confirmed where you’re allowed to hunt, LuckyFind helps you make the most of it — track your route on the map, log each find with its location, and revisit your saved hunt records. LuckyFind does not verify land access or grant detecting permission. Free for iPhone and Android.

New to LuckyFind? Follow the first-hunt checklist, then learn how to record a hunt and add finds.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I use a detector to look for a recently lost ring?
A complete current hobby-detecting rule could not be confirmed. The older archaeological exploration and excavation procedure had a different purpose, and its current effect after the 2020 heritage law is unresolved. Lawful entry, searching, digging and ownership of a find are separate questions.
Can I obtain a recreational detecting permit for either of the two named parks?
No available recreational permit was confirmed. Covered works need prior agency authorization, but article 37 restricts eligible purposes outside urbanized zones, and internal reserves have separate removal and extraction controls. The decrees do not establish that ordinary hobby recovery is eligible.
Does the exception for urbanized zones allow hobby digging?
It removes the stated article 37 limitation to listed work categories in those zones; it does not itself establish a hobby permit. The other works requirements, any reserve or heritage controls, and the unresolved current zoning and management conditions still matter.
May I dig a target on a beach?
A general beach recovery rule could not be confirmed. Article 120 of the environmental law penalizes removal of seashore materials, but its application to every small target hole was not established. Protected coastal parks add restrictions; an earlier park authorization clause does not establish an exception to the later environmental law.
Does the environmental law’s two-year period exempt visitors?
No visitor exemption is established. Article 126 gives the administration and sector professionals two years from promulgation to comply; it is not a general suspension of all protection. Complete later implementing measures were not verified.
Is the landowner’s permission enough?
Landowner agreement does not settle the complete legal position. Arrange lawful access, but also resolve applicable heritage, forest and protected-park controls. Permission to search does not make the finder the owner of recovered objects.
Can I keep half of anything valuable that I dig up?
No such general right was confirmed. Article 716 of the captured Civil Code concerns qualifying hidden or buried treasure discovered by pure chance, for which nobody can prove ownership. Its half-share provision concerns another person’s land; an intentional detector search does not automatically qualify, and current special heritage rules remain unresolved.
Does an ordinary lost object become mine after three years?
Article 2279 allows an owner to reclaim lost or stolen property within three years of loss or theft. That provision alone does not award every find to the finder after the period ends. Special lost-property rules and the complete current code were not verified.
Where and when should a heritage discovery be reported?
A current recipient and deadline could not be confirmed. The older 1994 law required immediate reporting by the finder or owner to the local administration, but its effect after the 2020 heritage law is unresolved. That historical procedure is not presented as verified current guidance, and uncertainty does not establish that reporting is optional.
Does this guide cover Mayotte?
No. Its scope is the Union of the Comoros national framework. It does not extend these rules to Mayotte or claim that all current island, municipal and site rules have been established.

Help keep these rules current

Report a change or mistake (opens your email app).

Your email goes to Stuck at Home LLC for manual review. Nothing changes automatically. Legal corrections are checked against official sources and independently reviewed before publication.

If the link does not work, email contact@getluckyfind.com with this page’s address, what looks wrong, and an official source link if you have one. Please leave out personal details and precise find locations.