Metal Detecting Laws in Micronesia

A nationwide rule for ordinary hobby metal detecting in the Federated States of Micronesia could not be confirmed. National and state heritage laws control different property and activities; maritime wreck reporting has a separate scope. Permission to enter land does not settle excavation, historic-property disturbance or ownership of a find. The available compilations leave important current-law gaps.

The rules, land by land

Even where detecting is allowed, archaeological and historic sites are protected, and you must fill every hole and follow posted rules. Always confirm the current rule with the land manager.

Detecting beyond Micronesia? We cover 207 more countries rule by rule too. See the world map →

Open data: every rule in our Micronesia guide, with its quote, source and check date, free to reuse (CC BY-SA 4.0). Download the data →

The national framework and current-law limits

Article VIII of the Constitution of the Federated States of Micronesia reserves powers not delegated nationally or prohibited to the states to the states. The heritage texts for Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap cannot be collapsed into one verified nationwide hobby rule.

Title 26, Historical Sites and Antiquities, of the Code of the Federated States of Micronesia, 2014, defines historic property by historical, archaeological or cultural significance. Section 102 defines historical artifacts as human-made objects produced at least 30 years earlier. That age threshold is not a detector license, a rule giving the State every find or a prohibition on every search for a modern lost item.

The national judiciary portal supplies a 2014 Code compilation. The state evidence includes Pohnpei’s 2012 advance-copy code, unofficial Yap and Kosrae compilations and a draft Chuuk chapter. Complete later amendments, state regulations and individual management conditions were not verified. These evidence limits do not establish permission to enter, search, dig or keep a find.

Historic property: national and state permissions

National title 26 section 401(2) requires express written permission from both the President and the Speaker of Congress for willfully defacing, disfiguring, disturbing or destroying historic property within the control and jurisdiction of the National Government. Section 401(3) also requires consultation with and approval of the statutory Institute and affected state or states before the President grants covered requests. Section 201 defines the Institute as the Director of Administrative Services or the Director’s designee.

Digging a target out of historic property within that national control and jurisdiction can disturb it and requires those written permissions. This is not asserted as the sole procedure for state or privately controlled property, or as a national rule for every non-disturbing detector sweep.

Pohnpei’s Historic and Cultural Preservation Act of 2002, title 22, chapter 1 (S.L. No. 5L-88-02), section 1-116(1), requires prior approval and written permission from the Pohnpei Historic and Cultural Preservation Review Board for knowing and willful removal, appropriation, excavation, injury, disturbance or alteration of registered historic property or property clearly eligible for registration. It covers public and private land.

For covered undertakings, section 1-110(5) provides entitlement to clearance after 20 working days following the Chief of the Division of Historic Preservation’s receipt of the application, if the Chief has made no decision either to grant clearance under section 1-110(2) or to refer the application to the Board under section 1-110(3), and no Board member has ordered referral under section 1-110(4). Separately, section 1-111(4) provides entitlement to issuance of a permit after 60 calendar days without a Board decision following referral or removal of the application. For good cause, a majority of the full Board membership, without regard to vacancies, may extend that review by up to 60 additional calendar days. Entitlement to issuance does not mean a written permit has already been issued.

Yap’s State Historic Preservation Act of 1989, title 5, chapter 4 (YSL 2-56), section 408, prohibits willful removal of historic property from the state or public domain and specified willful harm. Its State Researcher’s Registration Act, title 5, chapter 6 (YSL 4-33) does not override that protection: it concerns a defined class of full-time academic researchers and excludes FSM citizens and specified government researchers.

Kosrae State Code, title 11, chapter 14, Antiquities, section 11.1402, delegates scholarly, museum and educational antiquity-use authorization to regulations that were not obtained. The captured Chuuk protected-wreck chapter is expressly a draft, so it does not establish current permission to examine or remove objects. A complete protected-site detecting rule across the four states remains unresolved.

Beaches and foreshore

No general beach-detecting or recovery permission was confirmed. Constitution article IX section 2(h) excludes lagoons, lakes and rivers from its particular national navigation-and-shipping power. That allocation is not a public shore-access right or excavation permission. State, customary and property rights must be resolved for the actual shore.

Heritage disturbance and artifact-transport controls, protected-area rules and applicable wreck-reporting duties remain separate. Pohnpei’s designated marine sanctuaries and wildlife refuges have their own restrictions and authorization routes, described below; they are not every Micronesian beach. The wreck rules do not make every beach find ownerless or authorize recovery.

Forests, watershed reserves and mangroves

Pohnpei’s Watershed Forest Reserve and Mangrove Protection Act of 1987, title 26, chapter 4, in the Code of the State of Pohnpei, 2012 Edition (Advance Copy), section 4-105(2), places listed watershed-reserve uses under a permit from the Director of Land and Natural Resources. These include research on plants, animals and natural processes; recreation such as hiking, camping in designated areas and sightseeing; and other compatible uses authorized in writing. None establishes automatic detector or target-recovery permission.

Section 4-107 separately controls tree cutting and dredging, road building and other major land disturbance in mangrove forests, with a stated regulatory commencement condition. Major disturbance is not treated as every small recovery hole. These Pohnpei provisions do not settle forest entry or detector use in the other three states. Heritage controls apply within their respective scopes, and a complete current public-forest detecting rule remains unresolved.

Parks, marine sanctuaries and wildlife refuges

Pohnpei title 26 section 5-107 restricts disturbance or removal of state real and personal property, natural growth and minerals within its designated Marine Sanctuary and Wildlife Refuge System. It separately restricts dredging and removal of natural resources.

Section 5-108 nevertheless allows the Director to permit compatible public recreation and other specified uses under regulations. Section 5-107(2) separately provides for qualified institutions and individuals to conduct nondestructive scientific investigation with the Director’s prior written approval pursuant to regulations issued under that chapter. These qualifications prevent treating the system as either an absolute prohibition without exceptions or a routine hobby permit program. Individual-area conditions and complete corresponding rules in Chuuk, Kosrae and Yap were not established.

The retrieved Congressional material on the National Protected Areas Network includes Congressional Resolution No. 20-87, Approving and adopting the Protected Areas Network National Guiding Policy Framework, as introduced text, not verified adoption evidence. The framework itself was not retrieved. These records do not establish detector permission or a complete national operating code. Heritage controls remain independently relevant.

Private land and customary interests

Kosrae State Code, title 13, chapter 4, Offenses Against Property, section 13.412, treats entering another person’s property without express or implied consent, or refusing to leave after consent is withdrawn, as trespass. Yap State Code, title 11, chapter 3, Offenses Against Property Rights, section 307, separately penalizes unlawful interference with another person’s peaceful use and possession. Obtain consent from the lawful landholder; these state provisions do not establish a national detector license.

Customary and traditional interests must also be resolved with the relevant rights holders. The Constitution protects traditional roles, but the evidence does not supply one uniform consent procedure for all four states. Pohnpei’s historic-property permissions expressly extend to private land, and applicable national and Yap heritage controls remain separate. Landholder consent cannot replace public authorizations or give away a prior owner’s lost property.

Keeping finds, artifact transport and salvage

National title 26 section 401(1) requires express written permission from the Governor and two-thirds of the legislature of the state where historical artifacts were found for their willful transport in interstate or foreign commerce. That commerce qualification matters: it is not expanded into every movement of a find. Transport permission does not confer ownership.

Yap title 11 section 313 makes it theft to control another person’s property known to be lost, mislaid or delivered by mistake and, intending permanently to deprive the owner, fail to take reasonable measures to restore it to someone entitled to it. Pohnpei title 61 section 6-146 has a similar restoration requirement with its knowledge and deprivation elements. These offenses do not establish a complete nationwide finder-title or treasure-sharing rule.

The National Maritime Act, 1997 (PL 10-76), codified in title 19, chapter 9, Wreck and Salvage, preserves a lawful owner’s recovery claim. It provides for official sale of an unclaimed wrecked vessel after one year from the Receiver’s possession, payment of expenses and salvage, and payment of the balance to the national General Fund. Salvage remuneration is not automatic ownership.

Section 901’s salvage exclusions cover fixed or floating platforms and mobile offshore drilling units when on location and engaged in exploration, exploitation or production of seabed mineral resources. They also cover defense-force craft and other noncommercial vessels entitled to sovereign immunity, unless the flag state decides otherwise. These are salvage exclusions, not a blanket exemption from the chapter’s wreck-reporting rules. Complete current ownership rights across the states remain unresolved.

Wreck reporting and inland discoveries

National Maritime Act section 904 requires an owner, master or other person finding or taking possession of a wreck to notify the Receiver and deliver it if requested. Section 903(3) separately requires cargo and other articles leaving a wrecked vessel to be delivered to the Receiver. Section 904 specifies no immediate, hourly or daily reporting deadline.

Section 902 makes the Secretary the Receiver, with authority to delegate to the relevant state authority. Title 19, chapter 1, General Provisions, section 106(33), identifies that office as the Secretary of the Department of Transportation and Communications. Section 102(1)’s general application is subject to specific sections; chapter 9 section 901 separately states that its provisions relate to all vessels and small craft, with its listed exclusions limited to salvage.

Section 106(42) defines wreck to include a vessel or part damaged by a casualty to the extent that the vessel’s seaworthiness is threatened or destroyed, its cargo, and jetsam, flotsam, lagan and derelict. That definition and the chapter’s application must be considered before treating an object as a covered wreck find. Ordinary inland lost property is a separate question.

Pohnpei’s heritage section 1-112 requires a project administrator immediately to notify the Chief of the Division of Historic Preservation and stop affected work when a covered undertaking is likely to affect registered or clearly historic property, even after clearance or a permit. Work resumes only through the prescribed clearance or permit process. A current universal inland chance-find recipient and deadline across all states were not confirmed.

Find more, remember where

Download LuckyFind — free for iPhone and Android — to track your routes, log your finds, and keep your permitted spots organized.